One minor criticism: too much emphasis on drug development and new technology (e.g. whole genome sequencing, “robot” cleaning), not enough discussion of the hard work of basic infection prevention (hand hygiene, contact precautions, environmental cleaning). I know from discussion with those involved that these topics were discussed during interviews, but probably not deemed compelling enough to survive the editing process. New drugs buy some time and can be life-saving, but only until bacteria catch up…..and genome sequencing didn’t halt the NIH outbreak, strict enforcement of basic prevention measures did. I hear a lot of general nihilism about hand hygiene (adherence rates will never exceed 60%, high rates can never be sustained, etc., etc.). The truth is that we have much more work to do to better understand and solve the hand hygiene problem.
Frontline plans a second show in the spring of 2014 that covers the role of antimicrobial use in driving resistance, which I look forward to seeing. Might I suggest they begin planning a third installment, dedicated exclusively to the problem of hand hygiene in healthcare settings?
Photo of Ignaz Semmelweis from Wikipedia Commons

Great review Dan. John Quinn was a gentleman and will be greatly missed.
ReplyDeletethanks for an interesting post! Phil
ReplyDeleteNice summary, thanks!
ReplyDelete