Last year, I blogged about a study that suggested that fist bumps replace the handshake, since the fist bump has less surface area contact and the duration is shorter. More recently I blogged that some physicians in Los Angeles were recommending that handshakes be banned in hospitals. Now a new study in the American Journal of Infection Control demonstrates that the transfer of bacteria is 20-fold higher with a handshake than a fist bump.
Ok, all you infection preventionists and hospital epidemiologists: what are we waiting for? Well, of course, the randomized controlled trial demonstrating lower rates of healthcare associated infections. Because, you know, common sense is quaint.
Photo: Craig Lassig / EPA
Pondering vexing issues in infection prevention and control
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
OSHA! OSHA! OSHA!
In many parts of the country, as rates of COVID-19 are declining and vaccination coverage is increasing (albeit with substantial variati...
-
Back on clinical service again and having more thoughts on poor hospital design. Last month I wondered why there were no stethoscope wipe...
-
Those that follow me on twitter or the blog have probably noticed my recent focus on trying to understand the emergence of compulsory influe...
-
REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha With the assistance of a great supply management team, we have been able to outfit all of our clinical staff wit...

Let's not over think HH too much and focus on strategies to improve training and compliance in aseptic technique where we will probably get more bang for our buck in terms if reducing HAIs. This is particularly relevant when IC resources may be limited. Glenys Harrington, Infection Control Consultancy (ICC). Melbourne Australia. infexion@ozemail.com.au
ReplyDelete