Tuesday, June 9, 2009
What's in a name?
In this morning's New York Times, Dr. Larry Altman discusses problems with usage of the term "pandemic." He notes that a "useful definiton is far more complicated and elusive than officials thought," and reference sources are contradictory and imprecise. As Dan questioned in previous posts here and here, does pandemic only involve how widespread the disease is geographically or does it also have implications for severity of illness? Help is apparently on the way, since Dr. Altman's piece points out that the Control of Communicable Diseases Manual, the bible for field epidemiologists, will contain a definition for pandemic.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
OSHA! OSHA! OSHA!
In many parts of the country, as rates of COVID-19 are declining and vaccination coverage is increasing (albeit with substantial variati...
-
In many parts of the country, as rates of COVID-19 are declining and vaccination coverage is increasing (albeit with substantial variati... -
This is a guest post by Jorge Salinas, MD, Hospital Epidemiologist at the University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics. There is virtually no...
-
I’m surprised that we can’t stop arguing about the modes of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, despite the fact that most experts (including our frie...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for submitting your comment to the Controversies blog. To reduce spam, all comments will be reviewed by the blog moderator prior to publishing. However, all legitimate comments will be published, whether they agree with or oppose the content of the post.