There is an important paper in PLoS Medicine by Sarah Walker et al. in the UK that measured the proportion of C. diff cases in hospitalized patients that were acquired during their index hospital stay. The results are pretty surprising. Using MLST, only ~25% of cases could be linked to inpatient transmission, ranging from 37% in renal/transplant down to 6% in specialist surgery. Additionally, many of the C. difficile cases linked to in-hospital transmission manifest soon after the index case appeared clinically. In the accompanying editorial, Harbarth and Samore suggest that this means "the hospital environment was not, as has previously been claimed, a long-lasting reservoir for this pathogen."
Sources:
1) Walker AS, et al PLoS Medicine February 2012
2) Harbarth S and Samore MH et al. PLoS Medicine (Editorial)
Pondering vexing issues in infection prevention and control
Showing posts with label plos medicine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label plos medicine. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
OSHA! OSHA! OSHA!
In many parts of the country, as rates of COVID-19 are declining and vaccination coverage is increasing (albeit with substantial variati...
-
Back on clinical service again and having more thoughts on poor hospital design. Last month I wondered why there were no stethoscope wipe...
-
This is a guest post by Jorge Salinas, MD, Hospital Epidemiologist at the University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics. There is virtually no...
-
I’m surprised that we can’t stop arguing about the modes of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, despite the fact that most experts (including our frie...
