
Mike posted on a paper refuting the possible link between
XMRV and chronic fatigue syndrome over a year ago. Now it appears that
both the
2009 Science paper and
2010 PNAS paper supporting such a link have been
retracted. The reasons for retraction of each paper appear to be very different. For example, the story of the Science paper authors' possible i
mage manipulation described by blogger Abbie Smith is pretty fascinating. A great description of both retractions and related media reports can be found for both the
Science and
PNAS paper at
Retraction Watch. All of this is very unfortunate for the scientific community and especially the affected patients.
Sources:
Retraction of Lombardi et al., Science 326 (5952) 585-589 in
Science 23 December 2011: Vol. 334 no. 6063 p. 1636
NY Times, David Tuller 12/26/2011
h/t Ivan Oransky at
Retraction Watch Blog 12/26/2011
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for submitting your comment to the Controversies blog. To reduce spam, all comments will be reviewed by the blog moderator prior to publishing. However, all legitimate comments will be published, whether they agree with or oppose the content of the post.