MRSA in water treatment plants! Panic?!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69d7c/69d7c5b08c34ed0e829543a3929ee1e5c3508f26" alt=""
Sounds pretty scary, and if you don't read carefully, you might conclude that you shouldn't drink municipal water. However, it appears that most of the MRSA/MSSA was detected in "influent" or pretreatment samples, which were 83% positive, while 17% of post-treatment "effluent" samples were positive and only 8% were MRSA positive. This suggests that water treatment is effective in eliminating S. aureus, so keep drinking the water.
Note: The positive samples in the effluent were collected during periods when seasonal chlorination was not taking place. Thus, if your municipality uses chlorination, there is likely little S. aureus risk. Also, we should ask if we can generalize beyond this 4-facility sample.
Image Source: EPA via CDC
Well, I always did say whisky, or whiskey, was the answer to most of mankind's problems. Wine is better, but what else should you expect from an old ship-broker?
ReplyDeleteBut before dismissing me completely, you should just think about cruise line epidemics: Norovirus, Hepatitis E and much else and this award winning article: http://www.cruiselawnews.com/2010/06/articles/norovirus/cruise-ship-norovirus-something-in-the-water/
Scientists love closed communities such as islands but cruise lines, much to their distress, are even better.
--
Regards
Pat Gardiner
Release and independently audit the results of testing British pigs
for MRSA, C.Diff and Hepatitis E now!
www.go-self-sufficient.com and http://animal-epidemics.blogspot.com/
Thank you for clarifying this one. We had read it earlier this week and really began to wonder about it.
ReplyDelete