CDC versus Google Trends


Influenza is capturing a lot of media attention this week. Boston declared a public health emergency, activity is widespread in all but two states, and Iā€™ve heard reports of sporadic shortages (of masks, lab testing supplies, pediatric oseltamivir preparations, etc.). Meanwhile, Google Flu Trends (which tracks flu activity via internet searches) has been ā€œblinking redā€ for several weeks. This Slate piece asks an interesting question: should we be paying more attention to the Google data, orā€¦.should we have paid more attention to it as the trend line started ramping up in late November? I suppose the answer depends upon what we could have done earlier to blunt the impact of what the CDC predicts to be a ā€œmoderately severeā€ flu season. Push the vaccine more aggressively, and otherwise get a head start on local preparation, including supplies of masks, antivirals, vaccine, etc.? Promote social distancing or provide advance warning against presenteeism (both at work and school)?

I canā€™t conclude this post without pointing out that our colleague, Phil Polgreen, published his work on influenza prediction using Yahoo search data before the oft-cited Google paper was published. Phil followed this with some crazy-good Twitter work, too. Credit where credit is due, and all that.

Comments

Most Read Posts (Last 30 Days)