A Face Shield Strategy to Reduce COVID-19 Nosocomial Transmission


In previous blog posts, I mentioned the implementation of face shields to prevent nosocomial COVID-19 infection. Over the past few days, I have received many questions from people across the country, so I thought it would be useful to pull everything together in a single post and add some details.

Rationale

As we began to prepare for the pandemic, we assessed our inventory of personal protective equipment (PPE). However, knowing current inventory levels alone is not useful. It's deceiving when you see PPE inventory levels of several hundred thousand items. How could we ever run out, right? This is why your inventory levels must be evaluated in the context of normal demand. Your supply chain folks should be able to tell you how many PPE items are normally used on a daily or weekly basis. Next, you need to determine your expected demand for the outbreak. There is no right answer here as there are too many unknowns. You'll just need to make an educated guess. We determined that our critical level of each PPE item was 12 weeks (84 days) at four times normal demand*, although you could argue that this is an underestimate. Next our supply chain group developed an interactive spreadsheet with each row being a PPE item, and columns showing current inventory; normal demand per day; and days of stock at normal demand, two times normal demand, and four times normal demand. The final column (days of stock at four times normal demand) is color coded as follows: red <84 days, yellow 85-111 days, green >112 days (16 weeks). Once this is done, you will likely be surprised to find that what seemed like an abundance is really not so. When evaluating your levels, you also need to consider that some items are on allocation and you can expect to receive periodic shipments, while others are simply stocked out with no promise of future deliveries.

After reviewing all of the above, the most worrisome thing for us was an inadequate supply of face masks (<84 days at four times normal usage). My biggest fear was that we would overuse them early in the outbreak when few COVID patients are hospitalized, then have none after the surge of COVID inpatients arrived. Many hospitals had extended the use of face masks beyond a single patient encounter, which is a reasonable decision in this time of shortage, but we know that face masks lose their effectiveness when they get wet. Some began to use cloth masks, which is also a problem. So I began to wonder whether face masks could be replaced by face shields.

Why face shields?
  • They provide greater facial surface area coverage than face masks by protecting all the facial mucosal surfaces from infectious droplets. 
  • Given that the eyes are protected, we can eliminate the need for goggles when a face mask is worn. And we know that healthcare workers are really bad at wearing eye protection.
  • They prevent you from touching your face. One of the major drawbacks of face masks is that some people will touch their faces even more to adjust the mask and this poses a risk for autoinoculation by contaminated hands.  
  • Face shields are durable, can be cleaned after use, and reused repeatedly.
  • Many people (myself included) find face shields more comfortable than face masks.
  • Communication is better with shields than with face masks as your face is visible to patients and coworkers. 
  • If all of your healthcare workers are shielded, social distancing becomes less important.
  • And importantly, this is a device that is diversified across other industries. There is greater availability since the medical supply chain is so stressed at this time.  
Are there any disadvantages compared to face masks? The only one I can think of is the possiblity of a droplet coming in an upward trajectory going under the bottom edge of the shield. Although the probability of this is small, this can be minimized by having the shielded healthcare worker flex their neck when standing over the patient (for example, when performing a physical exam), bringing the bottom edge of the shield closer to the HCW's torso. Moreover, when doing a procedure that normally requires a face mask, we recommend that a mask be worn under the shield anyway. 

A few people have asked what is the evidence that face shields can replace face masks, and those particularly inclined toward methodolatry (the profane worship of the randomized clinical trial as the only valid method of investigation) continue to demand that face shields not replace face masks. Do I have evidence? No. To me, this is just plain common sense--we have a product that is reusable, cleanable, covers more of your face, decreases the risk of autoinoculation, and keeps us from burning through our mask supply. We have hospitals in the US where nurses are using bandanas to protect themselves. In this extraordinary time, I can live without a clinical trial.

Implementation

We quickly found that face shields marketed for medical uses were stocked out. One of our pharmacists went to a local hardware store and found shields used for grinding. We then explored vendors that supply hardware and agricultural products (see more here on the purchasing process). In addition, the University of Wisconsin has a great website that includes diagrams for construction of shields, and Johns Hopkins has a "recipe" available that can be used to create 50,000 shields. We placed the Wisconsin diagrams on the hospital website and several manufacturing firms responded that they could fabricate them for us. In addition, we have had some designed and produced by people interested in 3-D printing. One of our physicians, modified the Johns Hopkins' information and has her kids at home making shields. We also placed on our hospital's website a request for donation of face shields that people have at home, and we received many donations. It has really been a community effort. As our supply of shields grows daily, we deploy them throughout the medical center. At this point, the shields are handed off from one worker to the next as their shift ends, but our ultimate goal is for every person to have one for their personal use. 

Here are the instructions we give to our staff on when to use face shields:
  • Wear the face shield with every patient encounter (COVID and non-COVID patients) over a medical mask. Think of it as a new component of standard precautions--every patient, every time.
  • For COVID patients (confirmed or suspect), if an aerosol generating procedure is being performed, wear the face shield over an N95 respirator.
To help introduce the concept to our workforce, we produced this video:


We still have some details to iron out, such as the best product to clean the shield, since some products damage polycarbonate. We have had some of the shields break, so fabricating replacement shields to repair them is ongoing. 


Lastly, I have had a number of people who want to purchase their own shield ask me which one I recommend. Over the past two weeks, I have tried many models and have become a face shield connaisseur. If you want to buy your own, I think the best is the Uvex Bionic S8510 made by Honeywell (shown in the photo to the right). It is more sturdy than many other models, provides greater facial coverage (extends laterally on the face to your ears), and is comfortable. What really sets it apart is the V-shaped, downward projecting bottom border of the shield. This allows it to sit close to your upper torso, minimizing the risk of upward trajectory droplets. As an added bonus, from a sartorial standpoint, you'll look top-notch in this one! It's the kingdaddy!

This is probably more than you ever wanted to know about face shields. But it's a crazy time and we hospital epidemiologists are doing things I could have never imagined just a month ago. The bottom line is that by employing face shields we are able to protect our workforce while extending the duration of time that we will have face masks available.

Stay safe and be well!

Mike Edmond


*Addendum: A hospital in New York reported 15-30 times normal demand for face masks.


Comments

  1. Brilliant! well done and thanks for sharing
    regards
    Glenys
    Glenys Harrington
    Consultant
    Infection Control Consultancy (ICC)
    P.O. Box 6385
    Melbourne
    Australia, 3004
    M: +61 404816434
    E: infexion@ozemail.com.au

    ReplyDelete
  2. The airlines are all requiring face masks. Some people find it very hard to wear a face mask for hours. Is there any way that you can help convince the airlines that a visor is acceptable?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks a lot for your blog. This Uvex Honeywell Bionic model looks awesome. I have recently purchased a Bolle Sphere. I haven't received it as yet.

    From my understanding I believe both of these ones seem to be very popular. I will end up buying the Uvex Honeywell Bionic one as well. Another good combination, in my opinion, are the Uvex and Bolle goggles and faceshield combinations. They have some models that have detachable faceshields. Sort of like a trail bike riders face shield in a way. I think that the goggle and faceshield combo, combined with a surgical mask underneath, would also be good.

    I've got a 3M Ultimate FX Full face mask but the filters are very expensive. As you correctly pointed out washability, durability, cost and re-usability are critical factors. The Uvex Honeywell Bionic face shield is on the money! Thanks again for your excellent blog!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thanks for submitting your comment to the Controversies blog. To reduce spam, all comments will be reviewed by the blog moderator prior to publishing. However, all legitimate comments will be published, whether they agree with or oppose the content of the post.

Most Read Posts (Last 30 Days)