Antibiotics are dangerous

Now, we can quibble about the study
design, and about the small absolute risk found (this NY Times article provides
some sample quibbling), but to me the larger point to make (again) is this:
ANTIBIOTICS ARE UNSAFE. They can
be lifesaving, to be sure, but they carry risks for all manner of adverse
reactions, including life-threatening allergic reactions, organ failure, C. difficile disease, cardiovascular death, emergence of multiple drug resistance,
etc., etc.
I don’t prescribe chemotherapy
for treatment of cancer. There are many reasons for this, not least of which is
that I am not an oncologist, but one is certainly the widely acknowledged
toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. Somehow, though, antibiotics have
developed a different reputation--as generally safe, well-tolerated, with few
downsides. Why else would they be so widely prescribed to patients who don’t
need them, or made available over-the-counter in some locales, or allowed to
enter our food supply? As John
Bartlett points out in the Times piece:
“We use azithromycin for an awful lot of things, and we abuse it terribly,” Dr. Bartlett said. “It’s very convenient. Patients love it. ‘Give me the Z-Pak.’ For most of where we use it, probably the best option is not to give an antibiotic, quite frankly.”
Perhaps spurring stewardship
efforts requires striking more fear into the hearts of antibiotic
prescribers. Those who understand
the many downsides of antibiotic use will be much more parsimonious about their
use.
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for submitting your comment to the Controversies blog. To reduce spam, all comments will be reviewed by the blog moderator prior to publishing. However, all legitimate comments will be published, whether they agree with or oppose the content of the post.